In cases of insufficient evidence of compliance, who bears the expense for tests required?

In situations where there is insufficient evidence of compliance with the mechanical code, the jurisdiction is responsible for covering the costs associated with any required testing. This is because it is the jurisdiction's duty to ensure that all work being performed meets the local code requirements and safety standards. By assuming this financial responsibility, the jurisdiction is able to uphold its regulatory functions and ensure public safety without placing the financial burden on contractors, equipment manufacturers, or property owners, who may not be at fault for the lack of evidence. This provision helps maintain an equitable system where accountability for code compliance remains with the governing authority, enabling them to enforce the standards effectively.